(Re)appraising the role of civil society in the IGAD-led peace process for South Sudan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/ajcr.v24i1.18278

Keywords:

Peace Processes, Peacemaking, Intergovernmental Authority on Development, South Sudan, Civil Society, Fragmentation

Abstract

This article (re)appraises the role of civil society in South Sudan’s peace process. Situated at the confluence of civil society inclusion/exclusion, the significance of civil society participation and its contribution to peace processes, the article contributes to literature on inclusive and sustainable peace. The article employs a qualitative case analysis to illuminate the dynamics of civil society participation in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)-led peace process for South Sudan. The article engages with factors that compromise the efficacy of civic action in South Sudan and issues that are injurious to the sector’s legitimacy. The article neither downplays the complexity and precarity of the environment in which the South Sudanese civil society finds itself nor overplays the importance and contributions of civil society to the peace process. More importantly, it reveals that civil society in South Sudan is severely fragmentated and suggests that this fragmentation needs to be addressed as it simultaneously compromises civil society’s peacemaking efficacy and undermines the sector’s legitimacy. In the end, the article adds to the view that civil society is not always a force for peace and the sector’s inclusion; participation does not necessarily contribute to legitimising or sustaining peace processes and their outcomes.  

Author Biographies

  • Ibrahim Magara, Coventry University

    Dr Ibrahim Sakawa Magara is a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow under the Peace and Conflict Resolution Evidence Platform (PeaecRep) at Coventry University’s Centre for Trust Peace and Social Relations (CTPSR). ORCID: <https//orcid.org/0000-0002-3721-2272>

  • Miranda Rivers

    Miranda Rivers is a program officer for the nonviolent action program at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) working on applied research on social movements, as well as training and education initiatives for activists and movements that are working to advance justice and build sustainable peace primarily in the East Africa region. Miranda holds a master’s degree in international relations with a focus on conflict resolution and negotiation from American University and is currently a PhD student in African Studies at Howard University.

References

Akol, Z. (2014) Inclusivity: A challenge to the IGAD-led South Sudanese peace process. The Sudd Institute [Internet], December. Available from: <https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/inclusivity-challenge-igad-led-south-sudanese-peace-process> [Accessed 09 March 2024].

Awolich, A. (2020) The boiling frustrations in South Sudan. The Sudd Institute [Internet]. Available from: <https://www.suddinstitute.org/publications/show/5edf110da7365> [Accessed 23 February 2024].

Bazugba, A.M., Poutanen, J., Riak, P.E. and Möller-Loswic, A. (n.d.) Women’s experiences in the South Sudan peace process 2013-2018. United Nations [Internet]. Available from: <https://www.un.org/shestandsforpeace/sites/www.un.org.shestandsforpeace/files/womens-experiences-in-the-south-sudan-peace-process.pdf> [Accessed 17 March 2024].

Belloni, R. (2008) Civil society in war-to-democracy transitions. In: Jarstad A.K and Sisk, T .eds. From war to democracy: Dilemmas of peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-210.

Boswell, A. (2018) South Sudan: Peace on paper. The New Humanitarian [Internet], 14 December. Available from: <https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2018/12/14/south-sudan-peace-paper> [Accessed 26 February 2024].

Brown, L.D. and Jagadananda, L. (2007) Civil society legitimacy and accountability: Issues and challenges. Centre for Youth & Social Development [Internet], January. Available from: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255631620_Civil_Society_Legitimacy_and_Accountability_Issues_and_Challenges> [Accessed 20 February 2024].

Cheeseman, N., Biong, L. and Yakani, E. (2023) How not to hold elections in South Sudan. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES). [Internet], April. Available from: <https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/suedsudan/20294.pdf> [Accessed 24 May 2024].

Chipaike, R., Tshuma, N. and Hofisi, S. (2019) African move to withdraw from the ICC: Assessment of issues and implications. India Quarterly, 75 (3), pp. 334‒350.

Craze, J. and Marko, F.D. (2022) Death by peace: How South Sudan’s peace agreement ate the grassroots. African Arguments [Internet], 6 January. Available from: <https://africanarguments.org/2022/01/death-by-peace-how-south-sudans-peace-agreement-ate-the-grassroots/> [Accessed 12 March 2024].

De Simone, S. (2022) State-building South Sudan: International intervention and the formation of a fragmented state. In: State-building South Sudan. Leiden: Brill.

De Waal, A. (2016) A political marketplace analysis of South Sudan’s peace JSRP Policy Brief 2. The Justice and Security Research Programme (JSRP) [Internet], March. Available from: <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08962ed915d622c0001b7/JSRP-Brief-2.pdf> [Accessed 19 March 2024].

Eli, S. and De Coning, C. (n.d.) The Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS). The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) [Internet]. Available from: <https://www.prio.org/publications/13061> [Accessed 08 February 2024].

Fornof, E. (2014) South Sudan activists call for civil society role in peace process. United states Institute of Peace (USIP) [Internet], 27 May. Available from: <https://www.usip.org/publications/2014/05/south-sudan-activists-call-civil-society-role-peace-process> [Accessed 17 March 2024].

France24. (2021) South Sudan marks tortured decade since independence. France24 [Internet], 9 July. Available from: <https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210709-south-sudan-marks-tortured-decade-since-independence> [Accessed 16 March 2024].

Higashi, D. (2022) Inclusivity in Mediation and Peacebuilding: UN, Neighboring States, and Global Powers. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD). (2019) Lessons for IGAD mediation arising from the South Sudan peace talks: 2013‒2015. IGAD [Internet], August. Available from: < https://mediation.igad.int/index.php/documents/9-lessons-learnt-draft-booklet-1final/file> [Accessed 17 January 2024].

International Crisis Group (ICG). (2021) Toward a viable future for South Sudan. ICG [Internet], 10 February. Available from: <https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-africa/south-sudan/300-toward-viable-future-south-sudan> [Accessed 08 March 2024].

Non-attributable comment, on 19 August 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 26 August 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 3 September 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 10 September 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 10 September 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 13 September 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 25 September 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Non-attributable comment, on 28 October 2021. Online. [Transcript in possession of author].

Jezard, A. (2018) Who and what is ‘civil society?’ World Economic Forum (WEF) [Internet], 23 April. Available from: <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/what-is-civil-society/> [Accessed 19 October 2023].

Johnson, D.H. (2016) South Sudan: A new history for a new nation. Ohio, Ohio University Press.

Kew, D. and John, A.W.S. (2008) Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiation, 13 (1), pp.11‒36.

Koos, C. and Gutschke, T. (2014) South Sudan’s newest war: When two old men divide a nation. Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR) [Internet]. Available from: <https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/38822> [Accessed 19 May 2024].

Liaga, E.L. (2019) The local turn in peacebuilding: A critical analysis of peacebuilding strategies in South Sudan. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). (2018) Estimates of crisis-attributable mortality in South Sudan, December 2013‒April 2018: A statistical analysis. LSHTM [Internet], September. Available from <https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/south-sudan-full-report> [Accessed 23 January 2024].

Madut, J. (2019) South Sudan and the collective pain of watching a peace agreement struggle for its life. Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility (CSRF) [Internet], 18 February. Available from: <https://www.csrf-southsudan.org/repository/south-sudan-and-the-collective-pain-of-watching-a-peace-agreement-struggle-for-its-life/> [Accessed 17 March 2024].

Magara, I.S. (2021) Timing of transitional justice mechanisms and the implications for the South Sudan peace process. Journal of the British Academy, 9 (S2), pp.9‒33.

Magara, I.S. (2023) Regional peace-making in Africa: A study of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)-led peace process for South Sudan, 2013‒2018. Social Science and Humanities thesis, Loughborough University. Available from: <https://doi.org/10.26174/thesis.lboro.23267078.v1> [Accessed 19 May 2024].

Mamdani, M. (2018) The trouble with South Sudan’s new peace deal. The New York Times [Internet], September. Available from: <https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/opinion/south-sudan-peace-agreement.html> [Accessed 25 May 2024].

Mayen, D. (2023) Somalia, South Sudan most corrupt countries in the world: TI report. The Eastern African [Internet], 1 February. Available from: <https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/rest-of-africa/somalia-is-the-most-corrupt-country-ti-report-4107774> [Accessed 16 March 2024].

Mohandis, R. (2018) Civil society: Who are the voices that are rebuilding South Sudan? Global Development Institute (GDI) [Internet], 26 October. Available from: <https://blog.gdi.manchester.ac.uk/civil-society-rebuilding-south-sudan/> [Accessed 15 March 2024].

Nilsson, D. (2012) Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace. International Interactions, 38 (2), pp. 243‒266.

Nyaba, P. A. (2011) South Sudan: The state we aspire to. Cape Town, Centre for Advanced Study of African Society (CASAS).

Paffenholz, T. (2014) Civil society and peace negotiations: Beyond the inclusion–exclusion dichotomy. Negotiation Journal, 30 (1), pp. 69‒91.

Peace Direct. (2019) Civil society and inclusive peace: Key insights and lessons from a global consultation convened on peace insight. Peace Direct [Internet], February. Available from: <https://www.inclusivepeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/report-civil-society-inclusive-peace-en.pdf> [Accessed 30 January 2024].

Pospisil, J. (2018) Building states while building peace? Statebuilding and security sector reform in peace agreements. PeaceRep [Internet], 24 June. Available from: <https://peacerep.org/publication/building-states-while-building-peace-statebuilding-and-security-sector-reform-in-peace-agreements/> [Accessed 23 January 2024].

Singh, A.P. (2020) Civil society and governance in South Asia: Issues and challenges. In: Tonny, T. A., and Ahmed, J. eds. Building Sustainable Communities: Civil Society Response in South Asia. Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.465‒479.

Sudan Tribune. (2017) South Sudanese rebels accuse government troops of ceasefire violation. Sudan Tribune [Internet], 26 December. Available from: <https://sudantribune.com/article62511/> [Accessed 07 February 2024].

Torrent, I. (2019) Problematising UN-local civil society engagement in peacebuilding: Towards non-modern epistemes through relationality. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13 (5), pp. 618‒637.

Tubiana, J. (2014) Civil society and the South Sudan crisis. International Crisis Group (ICG) [Internet], 14 July. Available from: <https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-africa/south-sudan/civil-society-and-south-sudan-crisis> [Accessed 07 March 2024].

Verjee, A. (2020) How mediators conceive of peace: The case of IGAD in South Sudan, 2013-15. In: Nouwen, S.M.H., James, L. and Srinivasan, S. eds. Making and breaking Peace in Sudan and South Sudan: The Comprehensive Peace Agreement and beyond. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 277‒296.

Verjee, A. (2019) Ceasefire monitoring in South Sudan 2014-2019: a very ugly mission. United States Institute of Peace (USIP) [Internet], August. Available from: <https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/20190829-pw_150-pw.pdf> [Accessed 15 March 2024].

Verjee, A. (2017) South Sudan’s High Level Revitalization Forum: Identifying Conditions for success. United States Institute of Peace (USIP) [Internet], 4 August. Available from: <https://www.usip.org/publications/2017/08/south-sudans-high-level-revitalization-forum> [Accessed 22 May 2024].

Vertin, Z. (2018a) A rope from the sky: The making and unmaking of the world’s newest state. Stroud, Amberley Publishing.

Vertin, Z. (2018b) A poisoned well: Lessons in mediation from South Sudan’s troubled peace process. International Peace Institute IPI [Internet], April. Available from: <https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1804_Poisoned-Well.pdf> [Accessed 08 February 2024].

Virk, K. and Nganje, F. (2016) The peacebuilding role of civil society in South Sudan. Policy Advisory Group Seminar Report. Policy Commons [Internet], 1 November. Available from: <https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1445001/the-peacebuilding-role-of-civil-society-in-south-sudan/2076759/> [Accessed 09 March 2024].

Wilson, J. (2019) The religious landscape in South Sudan: Challenges and opportunities for engagement. US Government Publishing Office (GPO) [Internet], June. Available from: <https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo147743> [Accessed 17 March

Downloads

Published

2024-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“(Re)appraising the role of civil society in the IGAD-led peace process for South Sudan” (2024) African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 24(1). doi:10.17159/ajcr.v24i1.18278.

Funding data